Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Ashok Ramulbhaya Malhotra (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Ashok Ramulbhaya Malhotra (ITAT Ahmedabad) No Section 68 Addition When Capital Introduction Pertains to Another Year: The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed the Revenue’s appeal for AY 2017-18, upholding the deletion of ₹2.27 crore addition under section 68 made on account of alleged unexplained capital introduction. The Assessing Officer had treated deposits of ₹2,27,18,959 made with M/s Honeyvick Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. and credited to the assessee’s capital account as unexplained cash credits, on the ground that no supporting evidence was fur...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Salary Taxable Only on Accrual, Not Mere Form 16 or 26AS Entries: Bengaluru ITAT Search Assessments Restored Despite Non-Compliance, Subject to ₹50,000 Cost: Bengaluru ITAT Section 270A Penalty Invalid Without Specific Charge: Bengaluru ITAT TDS Credit Denied Where Income Taxed in Another Entity’s Hands: ITAT Bangalore Foreign Tax Credit Can’t Be Denied for Technical Lapses if Form 67 Was Timely Filed: Bengaluru ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031