Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kalpesh Deepak Fuldale Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Kalpesh Deepak Fuldale Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Penalty Appeal Dismissed for Delay Cannot Be Thrown Out Without Merits — Section 270A Penalty Matter Remanded to CIT(A) The Pune Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for statistical purposes and set aside the ex-parte order of the CIT(A)/NFAC, which had dismissed the penalty appeal solely on the ground of delay of 380 days, without adjudicating the merits. The case involved levy of penalty under Section 270A for alleged under-reporting/misreporting of income. The assessee contended that the show-cause notice and penalty order did not spe...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Salary Taxable Only on Accrual, Not Mere Form 16 or 26AS Entries: Bengaluru ITAT Search Assessments Restored Despite Non-Compliance, Subject to ₹50,000 Cost: Bengaluru ITAT Section 270A Penalty Invalid Without Specific Charge: Bengaluru ITAT TDS Credit Denied Where Income Taxed in Another Entity’s Hands: ITAT Bangalore Foreign Tax Credit Can’t Be Denied for Technical Lapses if Form 67 Was Timely Filed: Bengaluru ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031