Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anuj Kapoor Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anuj Kapoor Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Missed the Clock by 28 Days:  TOLA Time Over, Reassessment Game Over: ITAT Applies Rajeev Bansal-  Delhi ITAT quashed reassessment for AY 2013-14 holding notice issued u/s 148 on 21.07.2022 as barred by limitation in light of Supreme Court ruling in UOI vs. Rajeev Bansal (469 ITR 46). Assessee Anuj Kapoor challenged validity of reassessment by way of additional legal ground, which Tribunal admitted following NTPC Ltd. vs. CIT (229 ITR 383). Tribunal noted that original notice u/s 148 was issued on 07.06.2021 under old regime & pursuant to UOI vs. Ashish A...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930