Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Sunder Singh (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Sunder Singh (ITAT Delhi) Once Onus Discharged, 68 Can’t Survive: Confirmations, ITRs & Bank Proofs Enough: Unsecured Loan Additions Deleted-Land Advances Explained by Subsequent Sale Deeds: In DCIT, Meerut Vs. Sunder Singh, ITA Nos.367 to 369/Del/2024 & 376/Del/2024, AYs 2013-14 to 2016-17, order dated 31.12.2025, Delhi ITAT dismissed Revenue’s appeals and upheld deletion of additions u/s 68 relating to unsecured loans & advances against sale of land. Pursuant to search u/s 132 on 05.02.2017, assessments were completed u/s 153A r.w.s. 143(3) making additions of ₹5...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031