Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Corporate Law

Aravalli Mining Rules Stayed Over Ambiguous Definition Concerns

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 13738
Case Name
In Re: Definition of Aravalli Hills And Ranges And Ancillary Issues (Supreme Court of India)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

In Re: Definition of Aravalli Hills And Ranges And Ancillary Issues (Supreme Court of India)

Supreme Court Puts Aravalli Mining Framework on Hold; Constitutes High-Powered Expert Committee to Revisit Definition

The Supreme Court, by order dated 29.12.2025 in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 10/2025 – In Re: Definition of Aravalli Hills and Ranges & Ancillary Issues, has kept in abeyance its earlier judgment dated 20.11.2025 which had accepted the Committee-recommended definition of “Aravalli Hills and Ranges” and the corresponding regulatory framework for mining.

Noting serious concerns raised by environmentalists, stakeholders and intervenors, the Court observed that the adopted definition—particularly the 100-metre elevation criterion and the 500-metre proximity test for “Aravalli Range”—may create ambiguity, regulatory gaps and unintended ecological consequences. The Court prima facie found that critical issues relating to ecological continuity, exclusion of large tracts from protection, and possible facilitation of unregulated mining in contiguous areas require independent scientific scrutiny.

Accordingly, the Court proposed constitution of a High-Powered Expert Committee of domain specialists to conduct a comprehensive, holistic and scientific review of the Committee Report and to clarify whether the present definition narrows the protected area, whether lower hill ranges stand unjustifiably excluded, and whether “sustainable/regulated mining” under the new framework could still cause ecological harm.

Importantly, pending such examination and till the matter attains finality, the Supreme Court has stayed the implementation of the Committee’s recommendations and its own earlier directions. As an interim measure of abundant caution, the Court has reiterated that no new or renewal mining permissions shall be granted in the Aravalli Hills and Ranges as defined in the FSI Report dated 25.08.2010, without prior permission of the Supreme Court. The matter has been directed to be listed before the Green Bench on 21.01.2026, with notice to the Union of India and the States of Delhi, Rajasthan, Haryana and Gujarat.

FULL TEXT OF THE SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT/ORDER

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 6,952

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.