Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sunita Khandelwal Vs PCIT (Central)-1 (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sunita Khandelwal Vs PCIT (Central)-1 (ITAT Mumbai) Section 263 Can’t Be Used for Fishing Enquiry: ITAT Mumbai Quashes PCIT Revision in Alankit Group 153C Assessments ITAT Mumbai (G Bench) in Sunita Khandelwal vs PCIT (Central) (ITA Nos. 3451, 3539, 3540 & 3541/Mum/2025; AYs 2015-16, 2016-17, 2018-19 & 2019-20; order dated 23.12.2025) has quashed revisionary orders passed u/s 263, holding that where the AO has already conducted detailed enquiries in 153C proceedings, PCIT cannot invoke s.263 merely by alleging “inadequate enquiry” without demonstrating any specific error or preju...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930