Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Meena Arjun Narang Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Meena Arjun Narang Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Allotment Date, Not Registration Date, Governs s.56(2)(x): ITAT Mumbai Deletes Stamp-Duty Differential Addition ITAT Mumbai (SMC Bench) in Meena Arjun Narang vs ACIT (ITA No. 6651/Mum/2025, AY 2018-19, order dated 24.12.2025) has allowed the assessee’s appeal, holding that for the purpose of s.56(2)(x)(b), stamp duty value as on the date of allotment must be adopted where part consideration was paid through banking channels prior to registration. The Assessee, a co-owner, was allotted a flat vide allotment letter dated 11.12.2010 and made part payment...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031