This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Cash Deposits Explained – Protective Addition Deleted
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Rabiul Islam Gain Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2013-14
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Kolkata
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Rabiul Islam Gain Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
No Protective Addition Once Real Owner Is Identified: Kolkata ITAT Deletes ₹6.93 Cr Cash Deposit Addition Employee’s Bank Account, Employer’s Money- Protective Addition Fails When Substantive Assessment Is Complete
Kolkata ITAT ‘D’ Bench in Rabiul Islam Gain vs ITO (ITA No.1485/Kol/2025) and Tapan Kumar Pal vs DCIT (ITA No.1487/Kol/2025), AY 2013-14, order dated 23-12-2025, allowed both appeals and deleted protective additions of ₹6.93 crore (cash deposits) and related interest, holding that once the real owner of the money is identified ...
Author Info
