Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Disclosure During Search Not Enough to Invoke Section 271AAB, Penalty Set Aside

Case Law Details

Case Name
Rajeswara Rao Anne Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2019-20
Advertisement
Rajeswara Rao Anne Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) Voluntary Disclosure ≠ “Undisclosed Income”: 271AAB Penalty Deleted on ₹24 Lakh The Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench of the ITAT, in Rajeswara Rao Anne vs DCIT (ITA No. 1438/Hyd/2025, AY 2019-20), deleted the penalty levied u/s 271AAB(1A) on ₹24 lakh which was offered by the Assessee during the course of search. A search u/s 132 conducted on 05.10.2018 resulted in discovery of excess gold jewellery, following which the Assessee admitted ₹24 lakh in statement u/s 132(4) and included the same in the return of income filed u/s 139(1). The AO taxed th...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,641

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *