Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Raghav Bahl (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Raghav Bahl (ITAT Delhi) Additional Evidence Allowed, Salary Refund Accepted & Foreign Property Source Explained: Delhi ITAT Dismisses Revenue Appeals Delhi ITAT, Delhi Bench ‘A’, in DCIT Vs Raghav Bahl (ITA Nos.1639 & 1640/Del/2023; AYs 2012-13 & 2020-21; order dated 19-12-2025), dismissed both Revenue appeals, affirming the detailed relief granted by the Ld. CIT(A). For AY 2012-13, the Tribunal upheld admission of additional evidence u/r 46A to establish cost & period of acquisition of shares sold during the year. The CIT(A) had meticulously examined tranche-wise ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930