Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Maninderjit Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Maninderjit Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar) Police Proceedings Are Sufficient Cause: 224-Day Delay Condoned & Peak Deposit Addition Sent Back Amritsar ITAT condoned a delay of 224 days in filing the appeal and restored the matter to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on merits, invoking principles of natural justice. The Assessee’s appeal arose from a best-judgment reassessment u/s 144 r.w.s. 147, wherein AO made an addition of ₹18.90 lakh u/s 69 on account of peak deposits in bank account. CIT(A) confirmed the addition. Before ITAT, the Assessee explained that the delay in filing appeal was d...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty Reassessment Quashed for Wrong Sanction: ITAT Bangalore Strikes Down 147 Order for Breach of Section 151 Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Delay in Form 67 – ITAT Remands for Verification Penalty U/s 270A Quashed – Failure to Specify ‘Misreporting Limb’ in Notice Held Fatal View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031