Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Income Tax Appeals Revived Despite 3,839-Day Delay to Ensure Merits Examination

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 13040
Case Name
Plaza Properties Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Appeal Number
Premium Access
Date of Judgement/Order
Premium Access
Related Assessment Year
2013-14
Subscribe to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement

Plaza Properties Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)

Even 10-Year Delay Not Fatal: ITAT Chennai Restores Appeals Dismissed In-Limine for 3,839 Days’ Delay

Chennai ITAT set aside the NFAC orders which had dismissed the Assessee’s appeals in limine due to an inordinate delay of 3,839 days in filing Form 35. The CIT(A) had refused to condone the delay as the Assessee neither gave specific reasons in Form 35 nor responded meaningfully to repeated notices, seeking only adjournments.

While strongly deprecating the Assessee’s casual and nonchalant conduct, the Tribunal nevertheless held that, in the interest of justice and equity, the matter deserved one more opportunity. ITAT accepted the Assessee’s plea that the delay arose due to belated knowledge of intimations issued u/s 200A levying late fee u/s 234E and restored the appeals to the file of the FAA. The Assessee was directed to file a proper condonation application with specific reasons and evidence, and the FAA was directed to adjudicate the issues on merits if satisfied with the explanation, after granting reasonable opportunity of hearing. Both appeals were thus allowed for statistical purposes.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT CHENNAI

These appeals filed by the assessee are directed against two orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 01.09.2025 & 29.08.2025 passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’). The relevant Assessment Years are 2013-14 & 2014-15.

Want to Read the Complete Judgment?

You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.

Read on with Premium
Goes straight to payment. GST invoice included.

One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 7,715

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.