Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : SRF Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
SRF Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Corporate guarantee @ 0.25% upheld; 14A interest disallowance & MAT add-back quashed; CER receipts held capital — ITAT Delhi in SRF Ltd Delhi Tribunal largely allowed Assessee’s appeals, following its own consistent precedents. On corporate guarantee, Tribunal held that guarantee fee @ 0.25% charged to wholly-owned AEs is at arm’s length, rejecting higher rates adopted by TPO/DRP. Tribunal reiterated that bank guarantee rates are not valid CUPs for corporate guarantees and that specific bank quotations obtained by Assessee constitute reliable comparab...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930