Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Punjab National Bank Vs Deputy Director (Appellate Tribunal Under SAFEMA Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Punjab National Bank Vs Deputy Director (Appellate Tribunal Under SAFEMA Delhi) PMLA Attachment Upheld on Hypothecated Car; Bank’s Charge Protected Only to Loan Extent, Remedy Lies u/s 8(8)  The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA at New Delhi disposed of the appeal filed by Punjab National Bank against confirmation of provisional attachment of a Maruti Brezza car under PMLA, holding that mere existence of hypothecation in favour of a secured creditor does not invalidate attachment where the asset is partly tainted. The Tribunal noted that the vehicle, valued at ₹10.69 lakh, was funded partly...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031