Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jhansi Lakshmi Ramanadham Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jhansi Lakshmi Ramanadham Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Age, dependence & apparent injustice matter: ITAT condones delay & restores capital-gains assessment of 81-year-old assessee Hyderabad ITAT condoned a delay of 292 days in filing the appeal & set aside the ex-parte order, restoring the matter to the file of AO for fresh adjudication. Tribunal noted that the assessee was an 81-year-old lady, unfamiliar with online procedures, dependent on her consultant, & frequently travelling abroad to visit her children settled in the USA. It was found that she became aware of dismissal of her...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930