Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

Allegation of clandestine removal based on documents from third-party cannot be sustained

Case Law Details

Case Name
Rashmi Cement Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Kolkata)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement Rashmi Cement Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Kolkata) CESTAT Kolkata held that the allegation of clandestine removal of goods cannot be sustained on the basis of documents recovered from such third-party premises. Accordingly, issue answered in favour of the appellant. Facts- The appellant-companies are in appeal against the impugned order wherein central excise duty totally amounting to Rs.67,28,17,794/- has been demanded under Section 11A(10) of the Central Excise Act,1944, along with interest and penalty thereon, for the period from 2011-12 to 2012-13. The ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *