Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Santosh Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Santosh Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur)

5 Years 11 Months Delay—Medical Hardship – Limitation vs Natural Justice: Tribunal Says Evidence Must Be Examined First

Assessee filed appeal before CIT(A)-NFAC on 12.11.2024 against reassessment order u/s 144/147 dated 08.12.2018, resulting in a delay of 5 years 11 months 4 days. Form 35 showed “No” against delay & no condonation petition was filed. CIT(A) dismissed appeal solely on limitation without examining merits.

Before Tribuna

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Recorded Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again U/s 68; Additions Based Only on Third-Party Statement Deleted Bogus Purchase Cases: Only Profit Element Taxable; 4% GP Addition Upheld Assessment on Amalgamated Company Held Void for Lack of Jurisdiction Penalty for Non-Compliance Deleted as Venial Breach Where Assessments Accepted Returned Income Carbon Credit Sale Treated as Capital Receipt, Not Taxable Income View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031