Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Santosh Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Santosh Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur) 5 Years 11 Months Delay—Medical Hardship – Limitation vs Natural Justice: Tribunal Says Evidence Must Be Examined First Assessee filed appeal before CIT(A)-NFAC on 12.11.2024 against reassessment order u/s 144/147 dated 08.12.2018, resulting in a delay of 5 years 11 months 4 days. Form 35 showed “No” against delay & no condonation petition was filed. CIT(A) dismissed appeal solely on limitation without examining merits. Before Tribunal, Assessee produced an application under Rule 29 along with extensive medical records showing his minor son wa...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031