Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shankar Sangeetha Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shankar Sangeetha Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) 31.03.2022 JAO-Issued 148 Notice Invalid: Chennai ITAT Quashes Reassessment & Penalty Assessee challenged reassessment solely on the legal ground that the 148 notice dated 31.03.2022 was issued by the Jurisdictional AO, even though CBDT Notification under Sec.151A dated 29.03.2022 mandated that all 148/148A notices must thereafter be issued only by the Faceless Assessment Unit. Tribunal examined the notice & relied on the table of High Court precedents, especially the Madras High Court Division Bench ruling in Mark Studio India (24.06.2025) which...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031