This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CIT(A) Cannot Set Aside Every Section 144 Order Automatically—Addition Deleted After AO Confirms Reconciliation
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Monika Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Jaipur
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Monika Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT Jaipur challenging the order dated 25 October 2024 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (CIT(A)) for AY 2016–17. The dispute originated from the ex-parte assessment order dated 14 December 2018 passed under Section 144 by the Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), Jaipur. The assessee raised several grounds, primarily contesting the CIT(A)’s decision to set aside the assessment to the Assessing Officer (AO) despite a remand report already being obtained. She argued that the CIT(A) incorrectly tr...


