Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hindcon Chemicals Limited Vs DCIT (TAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Hindcon Chemicals Limited Vs DCIT (TAT Kolkata) Assessee challenged the reassessment completed u/s 143(3)/147 on the ground that the notice issued u/s 143(2) dated 20.07.2017 was invalid since it did not specify whether the case was selected for limited scrutiny, complete scrutiny, or compulsory manual scrutiny, contrary to mandatory CBDT Instruction No. F.225/157/2017/ITA-II dated 23.06.2017 prescribing specific formats for such notices. Assessee argued that non-compliance with this instruction renders the notice invalid, thereby vitiating the entire assessment. AO contended that the notice w...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930