Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Section 44AF Overrides Section 139(9); Defective Return Notice Unjustified: Telangana HC

Case Law Details

Case Name
Mohd. Amzad Vs ITO (Telangana High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement Mohd. Amzad Vs ITO (Telangana High Court) The Telangana High Court heard two writ petitions together since they involved the same issue and parties. The facts were discussed with reference to Writ Petition No. 21351 of 2006. The petitioner, a retail timber dealer and an income-tax assessee, filed his return for Assessment Year 2003-04 on 16 September 2003 and claimed a refund of ₹1,25,098. His claim was based on Section 44AF of the Income Tax Act, 1961, a special provision introduced with effect from 1 April 1998 for computing profits and gains of retail business. The petiti...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,797

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *