Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jagir Kaur Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jagir Kaur Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) Ownership of Money cannot be presumed on Suspicion or Conjecture- Affidavits Unrebutted—ITAT Deletes Addition u/s 69- Assessee filed return for AY 2013-14 declaring Rs.7,12,110/-. Case was reopened u/s 147 on the basis of cash deposits of Rs.13,85,349/- in a joint SBI account with her daughter. AO issued notice u/s 148 on 20.02.2020, & after considering replies & non-submission of documentary proof for agricultural activity, treated cash deposits of Rs.12,00,000/- as unexplained investment u/s 69. Assessed income was determined at Rs.19,12,110/- &...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930