Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gold Spice Impex Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Gold Spice Impex Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Cash Deposits During Demonetisation Explained as Recorded Cash Sales—Books Accepted; Only 10% Sustained u/s 68 for Non-Compliance; 115BBE Not Applicable for AY 2017-18 The Assessee, a wholesale spice trader, filed return declaring ₹68,540. The case was selected for scrutiny owing to large cash deposits of ₹1.15 crore on 11.11.2016, abnormal increase in sales, and mismatch in customs duty data. Though the AO repeatedly sought year-wise cash-sales/cash-deposit details and issued summons u/s 131 to the partners, the Assessee failed to respond in the pres...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930