This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Bond Redemption Not Black Income: ITAT Rejects Revenue’s USD 3.2 Million Claim
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ACIT Vs Smt. Ami Rashesh Bhansali (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
ACIT Vs Smt. Ami Rashesh Bhansali (ITAT Mumbai)
The Tribunal recalled its earlier order after accepting documented proof that the US$ 32,13,307.60 credit in a foreign account was a legitimate investment redemption, not an undisclosed asset. With detailed records confirming the source and maturity of the offshore investment, the Bench emphasized that properly explained foreign credits cannot be taxed under the Black Money Act.
These are Revenue’s appeals against the common orders of CIT(A)-51, Mumbai, under the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income & Assets) Act, 2015 (“BMA”). The o...




