Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Corporate Law

SC Deletes Damodar Prabhu Cost: No Mandatory Levy When Parties Settle in 138 NI Act Case

Case Law Details

Case Name
Rajeev Khandelwal Vs State of Maharashtra & Anr (Supreme Court of India)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement Rajeev Khandelwal Vs State of Maharashtra & Anr (Supreme Court of India) The appellant was convicted u/s 138 NI Act. His appeal before Sessions Court failed. In revision before the Bombay High Court, parties arrived at a settlement & the complainant agreed to compound the offence. The High Court accepted compounding but, relying upon Damodar S. Prabhu Vs Sayed Babalal H (2010) 5 SCC 663, imposed “cost” to be deposited with the State Legal Services Authority. The appellant challenged only the imposition of such cost. It was argued that Damodar Prabhu invoked Article...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,900

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *