This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
SC Deletes Damodar Prabhu Cost: No Mandatory Levy When Parties Settle in 138 NI Act Case
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Rajeev Khandelwal Vs State of Maharashtra & Anr (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Rajeev Khandelwal Vs State of Maharashtra & Anr (Supreme Court of India)
The appellant was convicted u/s 138 NI Act. His appeal before Sessions Court failed. In revision before the Bombay High Court, parties arrived at a settlement & the complainant agreed to compound the offence. The High Court accepted compounding but, relying upon Damodar S. Prabhu Vs Sayed Babalal H (2010) 5 SCC 663, imposed “cost” to be deposited with the State Legal Services Authority. The appellant challenged only the imposition of such cost.
It was argued that Damodar Prabhu invoked Article...





