Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ujjaini Mahakali Devasthanam Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ujjaini Mahakali Devasthanam Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) 192-Year-Old Government-Administered Temple – 607-Day Delay Condoned; Reopenings & 271B Penalties Remanded as AO Earlier Granted 10(23BBA) Exemption In these six appeals—two against reassessment orders u/s 147 r.w.s.144 & four against penalties u/s 271B—the Assessee, a 192-year-old temple under the Telangana Endowments Act, explained a 607-day delay in filing appeals. Tribunal noted that the temple is administered entirely by the State Government, its PAN was wrongly created as “Firm,” & it was under a bona fide belief ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930