Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Delay Condoned Because Temple Believed Income Was Exempt Under Section 10(23BBA)

Case Law Details

Case Name
Ujjaini Mahakali Devasthanam Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2015-16
Advertisement
Ujjaini Mahakali Devasthanam Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) 192-Year-Old Government-Administered Temple – 607-Day Delay Condoned; Reopenings & 271B Penalties Remanded as AO Earlier Granted 10(23BBA) Exemption In these six appeals—two against reassessment orders u/s 147 r.w.s.144 & four against penalties u/s 271B—the Assessee, a 192-year-old temple under the Telangana Endowments Act, explained a 607-day delay in filing appeals. Tribunal noted that the temple is administered entirely by the State Government, its PAN was wrongly created as “Firm,” & it was under a bona fide belief ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *