Explore the Standard on Auditing (SA) focusing on auditor responsibilities and quality control procedures for financial statement audits. Learn about leadership, ethics, and engagement performance
ITAT Delhi held that benefit of deduction u/s. 80-IA of the Income Tax Act entitled as ground handling and cargo handling services are included within the scope of infrastructure facility.
ITAT Mumbai held that expenditure incurred on foreign currency on telecommunication charges and provision of technical services outside of India should not be excluded from export turnover for the purpose of computing u/s 10A of the Income Tax Act.
CESTAT Delhi held that any penalty or compensation received for any loss or damage caused by breach or non performance of the terms of the contract is not by way of consideration. Accordingly, service tax is not leviable on the same.
Madras High Court held that prosecution under section 276CC of the Income Tax Act justified due to non-filing of return within the stipulated time and wilfully concealing its true and correct income.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that initiation of revisionary proceedings by issuing show cause notice u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act without Document Identification Number (DIN) makes the entire proceedings invalid-in-law.
Ministry of Corporate Affairs imposes penalties on EMTEX International Limited for violating Section 92 of Companies Act 2013. Detailed analysis of the adjudication order and its implications
Ministry of Corporate Affairs imposes penalties on EMTEX International Limited for violating Section 137(1) of the Companies Act. Explore the adjudication order, penalties, and legal implications
MCA) recently imposed penalties on Rajvansh Auto Wheels Private Limited and its directors, Pradeep Garg and Praneet Garg, for non-compliance with Section 62(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The violation pertains to the company’s failure to submit a resolution in Form MGT-14 regarding the raising of loans,
Commercial training or coach services that were provided by the Institute of Clinical Research (ICR) were liable to service tax as Commissioner had recorded a finding, after careful examination of the activities undertaken by the Indian Institute that it was providing training or coaching for a consideration. The matter was remitted to the Commissioner to decide whether out of the total demand that had been confirmed, Indian Institute would be entitled to the benefit of – Input credit of the expenses incurred as per the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004; and the value of study material supplied; and cum-tax benefit under section 67 of the Finance Act.
