In the case of Welspun Corp Ltd vs. C.C.-Mundra, CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled that a minor increase or decrease in weight compared to import invoices, calculated based on theoretical weight, is allowable. The tribunal cited a previous judgment in favor of the appellant and set aside the demand for enhanced valuation.
In a significant ruling, ITAT Ahmedabad relieves an assessee from penalties due to accountant’s mistake. Full review of Dharmendrakumar B Mehta Vs ITO case here.
Delhi High Court overturns GST refund claim rejection in a landmark case, highlighting the necessity for reasons in Form GST-RFD-08. Read the full case analysis here.
Read an insightful analysis of the Madras High Court’s decision to confirm a penalty on goods transmitted without proper invoice and transport documents.
Supreme Court’s definitive judgement includes toughened glass under the ambit of “glass and glassware” according to the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1998.
ITAT Jaipur held that the difference in the closing stock is emanating from the difference in the working for the preceding years and that such difference cannot be attributed for the year under consideration. Accordingly, order not erroneous and jurisdiction of section 263 not invocable.
CESTAT Chennai allows the appeal filed by Nadippisai Pulavar K.R. Ramasamy Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd., rejecting the allegations of manpower supply. The demand for Service Tax is set aside.
CESTAT Chennai allows the appeal filed by Trade Wings Logistics India Pvt. Ltd., revoking the Custom Brokers license due to the Show Cause Notice being issued beyond the stipulated 90 days from the date of the offense report.
The Calcutta High Court dismisses writ petitions challenging preliminary reports issued by the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax in a tax investigation case.
The Madras High Court sets aside a GST demand and penalty imposed on M.B.M. Steels for an inward supply from a non-existent supplier without affording them an opportunity to be heard.
