Explore the challenges of AI-driven tax processing, focusing on the controversial addition under section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act for GST not deposited by the due date. Understand the implications and potential issues arising from automated systems.
ITAT Chennai held that addition under section 69 of the Income Tax Act sustained as no corroborative evidence produced to prove the source for the cash deposits during demonetization period.
Commissioner of Service Tax Vs Mail Order Solutions (I) Ltd (CESTAT Mumbai) The provisions regarding filing of appeals before the Tribunal are governed under the provisions of Section 86 of the Finance Act, 1994. Sub-section (1) ibid provides for filing of the appeal by an assessee before the Tribunal. The first proviso appended to sub-section […]
Madras High Court considers withdrawal of customs duty exemption for Apollo Hospitals’ imported medical equipment. Analysis of compliance with Notification No.64/88.
Gameskraft Technologies Private Limited Vs Directorate General of Goods Services Tax Intelligence (Karnataka High Court) HC held that There is a distinct difference between games of skill and games of chance; games such as rummy, etc. as was discussed in several decisions above and particularized in the Division Bench decision of this Court in All India […]
Legatum Ventures Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT held that capital gains arising on the sale of unlisted shares by a non-resident has to be computed only by reference to the provisions of Section 112(1)(c)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 without cognizance to the provisions under Section 48 of the Act. From the perusal […]
M.A. Projects Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT note that the notice is an omnibus notice without specifying the specific charge upon the assessee and in such circumstances, Higher Courts have held that penalty levied is not sustainable. In this regard, we refer to Hon’ble Bombay High Court (Full Bench at Goa) in the […]
Jute Cess will be payable only when the goods are removed from the factory and hence the demands made in all three Orders are not sustainable.
State Bank of India Vs PCIT-2 (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT note that the AO during the assessment proceedings had requested the assessee to furnish explanation in respect of such items of expenses and receipt appearing in the trading accounts and profit and loss accounts (either by way of excess or reduction) in comparison to last year. […]
No ample opportunity was given to the legal heirs of the deceased assessee. Therefore, this Court is of the view that the order impugned in the writ petition is liable to be set aside and the matter should be remitted back to the original authority for affording due opportunity to the legal heirs of the original assessee to put forth their case.
