Get insights into the West Bengal Settlement of Disputes (SOD) Scheme, 2023. Understand the acts covered and eligibility criteria for dealers and transporters.
Understand the taxation of winnings from online gaming like Dream11, Jungle Rummy, etc., as Section 115BBJ replaces Section 115BB before April 1, 2024. Learn about the new TDS provisions under Section 194BA, effective from July 1, 2023, with no threshold limit, impacting online gaming companies and players. Stay informed to comply with tax regulations and avoid penalties.
Central Government hereby approves ‘National Institute of Design, Ahmedabad (PAN: AAATN1137D)’ under the category of ‘University, College or Other Institution’ for ‘Scientific Research’ for the purposes of clause (ii) of sub-section (1) of section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with rules 5C and 5E of the Income-tax Rules, 1962.
Supreme Court held that Duty Free Shops, whether in the arrival or departure terminals, being outside the customs frontiers of India, cannot be saddled with any indirect tax burden and any such levy would be unconstitutional. Accordingly, tax levied on the same is refundable
ITAT Jodhpur held that addition on the basis of reasons not forming limited scrutiny is unsustainable as Assessing Authority cannot exceed the jurisdiction beyond the reasons specified for limited scrutiny.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that payment of interest towards compromise agreement was not made towards any infraction of law and therefore, the same is allowable under section 37 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that disallowance of sales commission expenses justified as there was no basis and reason for paying the commission to these agents who even otherwise were closely related to the assesse.
ITAT Jaipur held that once the penalty is levied for non-maintenance of book of accounts, there cannot be further default for not getting the same audited as required u/s 44AB of the Act.
Penalty for Non-Appointment CS – matter is returned back to Registrar of Companies advising to re-examine the issues in totality and pass fresh order by taking the above facts into consideration before passing adjudication order and imposing penalty on the Company and its defaulting officers.
Order imposes on the EP, CA Pankaj Kumar a monetary penalty of 300,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs); and debars him for 3 (Three) years from being appointed as an auditor or internal auditor or from undertaking any audit in respect of financial statements or internal audit of the functions and activities of any company or body corporate.
