Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Archive: 12 September 2012

Posts in 12 September 2012

Immunity under clause (2) of Expl. 5 to Sec 271(1)(c) available even if tax not paid by due date of ROI

September 12, 2012 1874 Views 0 comment Print

The only condition which was required to be fulfilled for getting the immunity, after the search proceedings got over, was that the assessee had to pay the tax together with interest in respect of such undisclosed income upto the date of payment.

No TDS on Payment to labourers appointed & paid through Mathadi Board

September 12, 2012 22595 Views 0 comment Print

The mandate of Sec. 194C is that the relationship of the person paying any sum to the person carrying out any work including the supply of labour should be in he nature of the principal to contractor. After anxiously examining the provisions of Maharashtra Mathadi Act and Scheme framed under it, we are of the opinion that there is no contractual relationship as a principal and contractor between these assessees and Mathadi Board,

Reopeing of Assessment to verify compliance with provisions amended in future is invalid

September 12, 2012 801 Views 0 comment Print

From the facts on records, it is apparent that the impugned notice under section 148 has been issued after the expiry of a period of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year in a case where earlier an assessment had been framed under section 143(3) of the Act. Under the circumstances, the proviso to section 147 would be attracted.

Consolidated service charges for let out property are taxable under ‘Income from house property’.

September 12, 2012 1814 Views 0 comment Print

There are concurrent findings of fact by the Commissioner (Appeals) as well as the Tribunal that no services are being provided by the assessee to the occupants of its property and that the service charges have to be included as a part of its rental income. The test to determine whether the service agreement is different from the rent agreement would be whether the service agreement could stand independently of the rent agreement.

Acceptance of application by Settlement Commission on basis of non-committal report of JDIT is not correct – SC

September 12, 2012 1719 Views 0 comment Print

The ITSC could not have been satisfied as to the acceptability of the assessee’s explanation with regard to the various issues raised before it in the report of the Commissioner merely on the basis of the reports of the JDIT. Without applying its mind directly to the report of the Commissioner and the materials referred to therein, it could not have reached the conclusion that nothing more was required to be added over and above the undisclosed income of Rs. 15 lakhs disclosed by the assessee. The ITSC thus ignored relevant evidence and material which it ought to have taken into account while processing the assessee’s application. [

Re-assessment held to be void if AO has not analysed in detail the reasons of reopening

September 12, 2012 748 Views 0 comment Print

Once the assessment was reopened to investigate the purchase of various lands then the Assessing Officer was duty bound to make enquiries to examine the purchase of these land as well as the sources for the same. The Assessing Officer has simply issued notice under sections 142(1) and 143(2) which is standard for format of the notice.

Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031