We have attached herewith Income tax Calculator for Assessment year 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13. The user have to select A.Y. for which he want to calculate Tax, Type of Assessee and have to input this taxable income in field provided. Once he provide these details calculator automatically calculates his tax liability and also gives below the Income tax Rate Chart which is Applicable to such Assessee in that Assessment year.
Calculate Long term capital gain on sale of capital Assets other then shares with the help of Indexation.- We have given below the Cost Inflation (CII) Index calculator which automatically calculates Indexed cost of your asset. In the calculator You just have to fill the Year of Sale, Year of Purchase , Cost of Purchase/Acquisition/Improvement and Index if sale is made in financial year 2011-12 or later. Cost Inflation Index for financial Year 2011-12 is 785 and for financial year 2012-13 the Index will be announced somewhere in August 2012.
Atma Ram Properties Pvt Ltd vs. DCIT (Delhi High Court) – In the present case, as already noticed, the Income-tax Officer, Azamgarh, subsequent to the completion of the original assessment proceedings, on making an enquiry from the jurisdictional Income-tax Officer at Calcutta, learnt that the Calcutta company from whom the assessee claimed to have borrowed the loan of Rs. 50,000 in cash had not really lent any money but only its name to cover up a bogus transaction and, after recording his satisfaction as required by the provisions of section 147 of the Act, proposed to reopen the assessment proceedings.
Country’s second largest software exporter Infosys today announced the launch of XBRL filing solution to help companies file their financial statements in the format mandated by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.
In view of large number of consumer complaints, the Government is considering setting up an inter-ministerial committee to look at ways and means to check false and misleading advertisements effectively. This was stated by PROF. K.V. THOMAS while delivering key note address at conference on ‘Strengthening Self Regulation of Advertising Content’ organized by the Advertising […]
Union of India & ANR. Vs. Pradip Kumar Kedia Etc. (Supreme Court)- The wait list of candidates recommended by the Selection Board, has not been given effect to. Under sub-rule (3) of Rule 4 of the Rules, the Central Government after taking into consideration the recommendations of the Selection Board make a list of persons selected for appointment as members.
If your refunds, rectifications, other matters like not getting orders to give effect to the Appellate orders, etc. are pending since long, reminders not bringing any results, you may make application under the RTI Act to the Commissioner of Income-tax (CIT), under whose jurisdiction you are assessed to tax. The CIT has to dispose your application within thirty days of the receipt of the request (S. 7 of the RTI Act). In other words, normally you will get your work done within these 30 days; i.e., Assessing Officer will send the required orders like intimations, orders u/s. 154, etc. with refunds, etc. and the CIT then will reply to your application within 30 days, stating that your application has been attended and you must have received the refund orders, etc. At times, there may be delay in getting some refunds as in my case, but you will get them ultimately.
ACIT Vs Modi Revlon Pvt Ltd (ITAT Delhi) – When non-resident technology partner does not pass on proprietary right to assessee on transfer of knowhow, the royalty paid by the assessee under a knowhow transfer agreement is revenue expenditure
DCIT Vs. M/s CMR Design Automation Pvt Ltd (ITAT Delhi)- Assessee was paying Shri Mahesh Chandra as share holder a sum of Rs. 25 lacs per annum as salary. This compared very favourably with the salary being disbursed in the industry in which the assessee was placed. Moreover, all disbursements to Sh. Mahesh Chandra was cleared by Board Resolutions. The profit of the assessee company has also arisen phenomenally during the year. In other words, commission and bonus paid to Sh. Mahesh Chandra was an incentive, which was directly related to the profitability of the company.
t is allged by few students that ICAI has asked question from the topics which were excluded by it from syllabus for November 2011 examinations by two separate Announcement published on its website. The allegation were made by students of November 2011 PCE examination in respect of Taxation paper. We have also received an email from one such students in which he explained the discrepancy and requested ICAI to do the needful. He also mailed his mail to ICAI officials. Text of the email is given as under. We are not publishing here the name of student to protect the identity.
