Notification No. 11/2011 – Income Tax [F.NO.V-27015/1/2011-SO(NAT.COM)]/S.O. 852(E), DATED 27-4-2011 WHEREAS by Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) number S.O. 121(E), dated 12th January, 2009, issued under clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had notified at serial number 20, Shree Navjeevan. (Vocational Training Programme, Medical camps and goods & cloth distribution) by Navjeevan Charitable Trust, 602, Shastri Hall, 292, J. Dadaji Road, Mumbai – 400007, Maharashtra, as an eligible project or scheme for a period of three years beginning with financial year 2008-09;
Notification No. 10/2011 – Income Tax [F.NO.V-27015/1/2011-SO(NAT.COM)]/S.O. 851(E), DATED 27-4-2011 – WHEREAS by Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) number S.O. 2370(E), dated 3rd October, 2008, issued under clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had notified at serial number 18, St. Gregorious International Cancer Care Centre (Research & Training) Centre for the Blind by St. Gregorious Medical Mission, Parumala PO, Pathanamthitta District, Kerala – 689626, as an eligible project or scheme for a period of three years beginning with financial year 2008-09;
FVU 3.1 was launched on March 18,2011 and is applicable for Q4 eTDS Statements for FY 2010-11 and 2011-12. Many deductors are not able to create eTDS statement and are getting the following error: T-FV-4278 Invalid tax deducted amount. Enter valid tax deducted amount.
Notification No. 9/2011 – Income Tax [F.NO.V-27015/1/2011-SO(NAT.COM)]/S.O. 850(E), DATED 27-4-2011 WHEREAS by Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) number S.O. 737(E), dated 13th March, 2009, issued under clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had notified at serial number 12, expansion of existing 100 bedded multi-speciality hospital (purchase of equipment, recurring cost and corpus fund) by H.M.S Education Society, Shetty Halli Road, Tumkur 572 102, Karnataka, as an eligible project or scheme for a period of three years beginning with financial year 2008-09;
NC Notification No. 8/2011 – Income Tax [F.NO.V-27015/1/2011-SO(NAT.COM)]/S.O. 849(E), DATED 27-4-2011 WHEREAS by Notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) number S.O.1237(E), dated the 28th October, 2003, issued under sub-section (1) read with clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had notified at serial number 1, “Construction of school and dispensary buildings, purchase of furniture, equipments and integrated development of the poor and marginalized especially the women and children in Trikkadavoor” by Shri C.J. Fernandez, Chooravilla Joseph Development Foundation, No. 54, Rest House Apartment, Rest House Road, Bangalore – 560001, as an eligible project or scheme for a period of three years beginning with assessment year 2004-05 which was extended further vide Notification number S.O.1597(E), dated the 14th November, 2005 for a period of two years beginning with financial year 2006-07 and which was extended further vide Notification number S.O. 1309(E), dated the 4th June, 2008 for a period of three years beginning with financial year 2008-09 ;
Notification No. 7/2011 – Income Tax [F.NO.V-27015/1/2011-SO(NAT.COM)]/S.O.848(E), DATED 27-4-2011 WHEREAS by Notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) number S.O. 1124(E), dated the 29th September, 2003, issued under sub-section (1) read with clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had notified at serial number 6, “Maintenance and running of Shri K.K. Shah Sabarkantha Arogya Mandal” by Shri K.K. Shah Sabarkantha Arogya Mandal, Post Vatrak Tal Vayad, District Sabarkantha – 383326, Gujarat, as an eligible project or scheme for a period of three years beginning with assessment year 2004-05; which was extended further vide Notification number S.O.1421(E), dated the 4th September, 2006 for a period of three years beginning with financial year 2006-07 and which was extended further vide Notification number S.O. 843(E), dated 25th March, 2009 for a period of three years beginning with financial year 2009-10;
Notification No. 6/2011 – Income Tax [F.NO.V-27015/1/2011-SO(NAT.COM)]/S.O. 847(E), DATED 27-4-2011 WHEREAS by Notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) number S.O. 60(E), dated the 22nd January, 2003, issued under sub-section (1) read with clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had notified at serial number 7, “Maintenance of animal hospitals or shelters, purchase of medicine, feed, ambulances and running of animal awareness programme and the project” by People for Animals, 14, Ashoka Road, New Delhi-110001, as an eligible project or scheme for a period of three years with assessment year 2003-04 which was extended further vide Notification number S.O.1599(E), dated the 14th November, 2005 for a period of three years beginning with financial year 2005-06 and which was extended further vide Notification number S.O.1466(E), dated 17th June, 2008 for a period of three years beginning with financial year 2008-09;
Notification No. 5/2011 – Income Tax [F.NO.V-27015/1/2011-SO(NAT.COM)]/S.O. 846(E), DATED 27-4-2011 WHEREAS by Notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) number S.O. 458(E), dated the 30th March, 2006, issued under sub-section (1) read with clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had notified at serial number 11, “(a) Vocational training, (b) Education to a destitute child, (c) Out reach cancer care, (d) Detection Camps, (e) Palliative therapy” by Global Cancer Concern India, A-99, Defence Colony, New Delhi-110024, as an eligible project of scheme for a period of three years beginning with financial year 2005-06 and which was extended further vide Notification number S.O. 1470(E), dated 17th June, 2008 for a period of three years beginning with financial year 2008-09 ;
Notification No. 4/2011 – Income Tax [F.NO.V-27015/1/2011-SO(NAT.COM)]/S.O. 845(E), DATED 27-4-2011 WHEREAS by Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) number S.O. 606(E), dated the 7th June, 2002, issued under clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had notified at serial number 1, “Running of Omayal Achi Community Health Centre at Arakambakkam” by Mr. Omayal Achi Mr. Arunachalam Trust, Coral Manor, ‘A’ Ground Floor, 40-41, Second Main Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai – 600028, as an eligible project or scheme for a period of three years beginning with assessment year 2002-03, which was extended further vide Notification number S.O.512(E), dated the 9th April, 2004 for a period of three years beginning with financial year 2003-04; which was extended further vide Notification number S.O. 999(E), dated the 5th July, 2006 for a period of three years beginning with financial year 2006-07 and which was extended further vide Notification number S.O. 835(E), dated the 25th March, 2009 for a period of three years beginning with financial year 2009-10;
Hon’ble Supreme Court in Provash Chandra Dalui & Anr (supra) has held that the essential element of waiver is that there must be a voluntary and intentional relinquishment of a known right or such conduct as warrants the inference of the relinquishment of such right. It means the forsaking the assertion of a right at the proper opportunity. Further, hon’ble Supreme Court in Smt. Dularia Devi (supra) observed that in Ningawwa v. Byrappa & 3 Ors (supra) this Court said the legal position will be different if there is a fraudulent misrepresentation not merely as to the contents of the document but as to its character. The authorities make a clear distinction between fraudulent misrepresentation as to the character of the document and fraudulent misrepresentation as to the contents thereof. With reference to the former, it has been held that the transaction is void, while in the case of the latter, it is merely voidable.
