In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962, (52 of 1962), the Board, being satisfied that it is necessary and expedient so to do, hereby fixes the tariff value specified in column (4) of the Table below, in respect of the imported goods of the description specified in the corresponding entry in column (3) of the said Table and falling under Chapter heading/ sub-heading number of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), as specified in the corresponding entry in column (2) of the said Table, having regard to the trend of value.
CIT vs. P.V.A.L. Kulandagan Chettiar (Supreme Court) -The review petition filed by the department against the judgement reported in CIT P.V.A.L Kulandagan Chettiar (2004) 267 ITR 654 (SC) {reg applicability of DTAA} has been dismissed.
Hero Exports vs. CIT (Supreme Court) -Though section 80HHC does not provide so, an assessee is entitled, in computing the indirect cost of goods exported, to claim deduction at 10% as indirect expenses incurred for earning export incentives, misc income and brokerage etc. The deduction is allowed on estimate basis and as per the underlying principles of apportionment.
