Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : Learn the updated provisions governing rectification, assessments, reassessments, and appeals under the Income-tax Act. This guide...
Income Tax : The article explains how the Finance Acts, 2025 and 2026 have reshaped the Updated Return regime under Section 139(8A). It highlig...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court has remitted reassessment cases for fresh consideration after the retrospective insertion of Section 147A, leavi...
Income Tax : This article explains why reassessment proceedings may be invalid if the Assessing Officer merely relies on Investigation Wing rep...
Income Tax : Learn about the new block assessment provisions for cases involving searches under section 132 and requisitions under section 132A...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Humble Representation for modification of Section 151 of the Income Tax Act relating to Sanction for issue of Notice under sec. 14...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : Bombay HC quashed Section 148 reopening for AY 2013-14, holding Section 43CA was inapplicable and stamp duty valuation alone could...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune quashed a Section 148 notice based on vague information and directed deletion of a ₹51.35 lakh addition for lack of su...
Income Tax : Where unaccounted sales were established through seized material, only the net profit embedded therein was liable to tax, and not ...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai remanded the case to examine whether Section 56(2)(x) applied based on the agreement date and to consider refund of ex...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore remanded a Section 69A addition after holding that an APMC commission agent's entire sale proceeds could not be tre...
Income Tax : The department has identified high-risk cases through its Insight Portal for AYs 2022-25. It directs officers to initiate reassess...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Explore the latest guidelines for issuing notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Understand key procedures, amendme...
Income Tax : Explore e-Verification Instruction No. 2 of 2024 from the Directorate of Income Tax (Systems). Detailed guidelines for AOs under I...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
Trinity Global Enterprises Ltd. vs. ITO: No disallowance under 40A(2) for supervision and risk management charges. Detailed analysis and conclusions provided.
Read about the ITAT Mumbai ruling in Inderjit Singh Manchanda vs. CIT case, where the application for condonation of delay regarding penalty proceedings appeal was dismissed.
Kerala High Court affirms that personal hearing is mandatory before issuing orders under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act.
Kerala High Court rules that personal hearing is mandatory before passing an order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act.
Kerala High Court dismisses Revenue appeal, upholding the necessity of a personal hearing before issuing orders under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act.
Delhi’s ITAT dismisses revenue’s appeal, upholding CIT(A)’s deletion of additions under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act due to lack of cash payment evidence.
ITAT Delhi held that Liaison Office playing an active role with regard to printing of books treatable as Permanent Establishment in terms of Article 5(2) of India-Germany Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).
ITAT Bangalore rules deduction under Section 80P of Income Tax Act requires filing of return of income, dismissing Madhu Souharda Pathina’s appeal.
Explore the case of Gundarlahally Ramesh Meera Vs ITO as ITAT Bangalore directs readjudication due to delay in filing appeal before lower authorities.
Bombay High Court quashes reassessment notices against Godrej Industries, citing issuance beyond the limitation period. A landmark victory for corporate law.
