Income Tax : Learn how different types of income tax assessments are conducted under the Income-tax Act. The FAQs explain assessment procedures...
Income Tax : This guide explains who is required to maintain books of account under Section 44AA based on business, profession, turnover, and i...
Income Tax : This guide explains the various assessments under the Income-tax Act, including summary assessment, scrutiny assessment, best judg...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that an addition under Section 69A cannot be sustained when the assessee is denied the opportunity to cross-exami...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : Learn about the new block assessment provisions for cases involving searches under section 132 and requisitions under section 132A...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : Lucknow CA Tax Practicioners Association has made a Representation to FM for Extension of Time Limit for Assessment cases time bar...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court held that reassessment cannot be sustained merely because of high-value bank transactions without evidence ...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that an addition under Section 68 cannot be sustained solely on information received from the Investigation Wi...
Income Tax : The ITAT Hyderabad held that the entire sale consideration could not be assessed as short-term capital gains without examining the...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune held that the reassessment proceedings were invalid because the notice under Section 148 was approved by the Principal C...
Income Tax : ITAT held that interest earned by a co-operative credit society from deposits with a co-operative bank remained attributable to it...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Excise Duty : Notification No. 29/2024-Central Excise rescinds six 2022 excise notifications in the public interest, effective immediately. Deta...
Income Tax : Learn how to initiate proceedings under section 147 of the IT Act in e-Verification cases. Detailed instructions for Assessing Off...
Income Tax : Explore e-Verification Instruction No. 2 of 2024 from the Directorate of Income Tax (Systems). Detailed guidelines for AOs under I...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
ITAT Chennai deletes ₹5 crore addition u/s 68, holding assessee proved source of funds. Lease deposit deemed genuine, creditworthiness established.
ITAT Bangalore upheld CIT(A)’s decision, ruling that interconnect charges paid to A1 Telekom Austria are not taxable as royalty under the Income Tax Act or DTAA.
ITAT Panaji ruled in favor of Ganga Suresh Rathod, setting aside NFAC’s order after her video hearing request was denied, citing a breach of natural justice.
ITAT Surat quashes CIT(A) order for not considering assessee’s submissions, directing the AO to reassess the case with due opportunity for the assessee.
ITAT Delhi invalidates reassessment due to non-application of mind in approval under Section 151 of the Income-tax Act, impacting jurisdiction under Section 147.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that the development rights in the land were not the land itself and, therefore, the provision of section 50C of the Income Tax Act was not applicable on transfer of development rights in the land.
Gujarat High Court held that reopening of assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act in absence of any tangible material to arrive at primafacie reason to believe that income has escaped assessment is unsustainable in law and hence liable to be quashed.
In the matter above mentioned ITAT deleted the addition made by the AO after observing that the provision invoked by the AO was introduced introduced w.e.f. 01.04.2014 only, whereas the assessee had entered into the transaction on 01.08.2012.
Addition against unexplained cash deposit of ₹49.50 lakh was remanded back to AO for verification if the deposits were from business activities, the addition under Section 69A could not stand.
Madhya Pradesh High Court stays reassessment notice under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, citing jurisdictional concerns and allowing further legal review.
