Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Subscription Books Submit Post
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax Subjective Difference Insufficient for Section 263 Revision: Gujarat HC Income Tax SC Dismisses Section 263 Challenge Where AO Had Conducted Inquiry and Verification Income Tax ITAT Hyderabad Allows Bad Debt Write-Off by Co-operative Bank Despite State Government Guarantee Income Tax Delhi HC Sets Aside ITAT Remand on NDTV Corporate Guarantee Issue Income Tax Telangana HC Quashes Income Tax Reassessment Order After IBC Resolution Plan Approval Income Tax Madras HC Upholds Section 148 Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-16 as Within Limitation Income Tax Madras HC Upholds Section 148 Reassessment Notice for AY 2013-14 as Timely Corporate Law IRDAI Warns Pramerica Life Over FY25 EoM Limit Breach
Topic Tag

#NCLT

Every article filed under the “NCLT” tag — analysis, news and updates.

1,013 articles
Corporate LawDelhi High Court Allows CoC Meeting Amidst Pending NCLT Case
Corporate Law

Delhi High Court Allows CoC Meeting Amidst Pending NCLT Case

CA Sandeep Kanoi12 months ago
Corporate LawAdmission of IBC application for default in repaying ₹5.7 Cr over 10-Year interest-free period
Corporate Law

Admission of IBC application for default in repaying ₹5.7 Cr over 10-Year interest-free period

RATHI12 months ago
Company LawLiquidation of JM Feed Pvt Ltd was ordered on satisfying conditions u/s 33 of IBC
Company Law

Liquidation of JM Feed Pvt Ltd was ordered on satisfying conditions u/s 33 of IBC

RATHI12 months ago
Company LawProvisions of moratorium shouldn’t apply to transactions which might be notified by Central Government
Company Law

Provisions of moratorium shouldn’t apply to transactions which might be notified by Central Government

RATHI12 months ago
Company LawApplication u/s. 7 of IBC admitted as default proved: NCLT Ahmedabad
Company Law

Application u/s. 7 of IBC admitted as default proved: NCLT Ahmedabad

POONAM GANDHI12 months ago
Company LawApplication u/s. 9 of IBC admitted as allegation of pre-existing dispute not proved
Company Law

Application u/s. 9 of IBC admitted as allegation of pre-existing dispute not proved

POONAM GANDHI12 months ago
Company LawCIRP u/s. 7 against Corporate Debtor admitted as default in repayment of financial debt proved
Company Law

CIRP u/s. 7 against Corporate Debtor admitted as default in repayment of financial debt proved

POONAM GANDHI12 months ago
Corporate LawLiquidation of Corporate Debtor ordered as CIRP period exhausted and no resolution plan received
Corporate Law

Liquidation of Corporate Debtor ordered as CIRP period exhausted and no resolution plan received

POONAM GANDHI12 months ago
Corporate LawApplication u/s. 33(2) of IBC for liquidation of Win Trendz Exim Pvt. Ltd. allowed
Corporate Law

Application u/s. 33(2) of IBC for liquidation of Win Trendz Exim Pvt. Ltd. allowed

POONAM GANDHI12 months ago
Company LawResolution plan of Corporate Debtor approved as requirement of Section 30(2) of IBC satisfied
Company Law

Resolution plan of Corporate Debtor approved as requirement of Section 30(2) of IBC satisfied

POONAM GANDHI12 months ago
Corporate LawCIRP u/s. 7 of IBC dismissed as application filed for recovery of dues
Corporate Law

CIRP u/s. 7 of IBC dismissed as application filed for recovery of dues

POONAM GANDHI12 months ago
Corporate LawElectricity connection cannot be withheld after settlement of claims on distribution of liquidation estate
Corporate Law

Electricity connection cannot be withheld after settlement of claims on distribution of liquidation estate

POONAM GANDHI12 months ago
Corporate LawStrengthening Financial Integrity: NCLT Permits Fraud Flags During IBC Proceedings
Corporate Law

Strengthening Financial Integrity: NCLT Permits Fraud Flags During IBC Proceedings

Vaanya Mathur1 year ago
Corporate LawWhn COC approved resolution plan with required majority, Adjudicating Authority’s Role was limited to section 30(2) compliance check
Corporate Law

Whn COC approved resolution plan with required majority, Adjudicating Authority’s Role was limited to section 30(2) compliance check

RATHI1 year ago