Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that a 21-year-old woman cannot be compelled to return home or marry against her wishes, treating residence, marria...
Corporate Law : The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that judicial officers cannot be intimidated for delivering judgments since every judicial orde...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Corporate Law : The Bombay High Court held that merely organising protests or morchas against government decisions cannot justify externment. It r...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court held that an unnatural death in police custody attracts constitutional liability under Article 21, even if ca...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court granted a one-month extension for filing TARs under Section 44AB for AY 2025-26, citing delayed audit utility...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Income Tax : Bombay HC quashed Section 148 notices, holding that search-based material required proceedings under Sections 153A/153C, not Secti...
Income Tax : Karnataka HC held Section 147 reopening invalid where seized material from a third-party search required proceedings under Section...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC quashed reassessment and penalty orders issued against a deceased person, holding proceedings concluded against a dead ...
Corporate Law : Andhra Pradesh HC held that AI-generated fake citations alone do not invalidate a judicial order if the correct legal principles a...
Income Tax : Bombay HC quashed Section 148 reopening for AY 2013-14, holding Section 43CA was inapplicable and stamp duty valuation alone could...
Income Tax : The Court held that membership cannot be granted where the underlying flats do not exist and are merely refuge areas. It ruled tha...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Anticipatory bail granted by Jharkhand HC in alleged coal smuggling case. Valid tax invoices and e-way bills were key factors in the decision.
Construction of canals/ pipelines/ conduits to support irrigation, water supply or for sewerage disposal, when provided to the Government, could not be exigible to service tax. Once tax was not payable in law, there was no authority for the department to retain such an amount.
Allahabad HC directs GST authorities to avoid overlapping assessments for the same period; State GST barred from reassessing FY 2017-18 already completed.
Jharkhand High Court allows Input Tax Credit for delayed returns of FY 2017-18, directs refund of penalty and interest under GST law with 6% annual interest.
Delhi HC directs CBDT to address anomalies in the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024 raised by a petitioner regarding discriminatory appeal provisions. Details inside.
Orissa HC stays SCN issued by Centre on a GST matter already addressed by state authorities, citing consolidation issues and legal provisions.
Madras High Court directed to grant an opportunity of being heard on payment of 25% of disputed taxes in the case of fraudulent availment of input tax credit on the basis of bogus invoices.
Delhi High Court held that clause (b) of Section 148A of the Income Tax Act does not stipulate that the Assessee is required to be provided minimum of seven working days. Accordingly, petition held to be unmerited and hence disposed of.
Madras High Court held that GST demand on account of mismatch between Form 26AS and GSTR 2B is liable to be set aside on payment of 25% of pre-deposit. Accordingly, opportunity of being heard will be granted on payment of directed pre-deposit.
Union of India had launched prosecution u/s 276 (B) of IT Act, against the petitioner. By virtue of section 482 CrPC petitioner requests for the quashing of prosecution.
