Goods and Services Tax : The article explains that GST refunds depend on correct statutory classification, documentation, and timelines. It highlights that...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn the statutory framework governing GST refunds under Section 54 of the CGST Act, including eligibility, filing procedures, do...
Goods and Services Tax : The Delhi High Court held that the amended limitation provision under Section 54 cannot be applied retrospectively to deny refund ...
Goods and Services Tax : Section 54(3) permits refund of unutilised ITC for zero-rated supplies and inverted duty structures. The key takeaway is that refu...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN has permanently removed PDF-based Annexure-B filing for ITC refund claims and made the Excel-based Offline Utility compulsory...
Goods and Services Tax : The representation highlights ambiguity in whether the ₹2.5 crore ITC threshold should be annual or cumulative. It emphasizes th...
Goods and Services Tax : CBI arrests Superintendent of Central GST & Central Excise in Berhampur for accepting Rs. 15,000 bribe from complainant regarding ...
Goods and Services Tax : While filing Annual Return GSTR-4, if composition taxpayers have deposited excess tax, they will now be able to file for GST refu...
Goods and Services Tax : Processing of Refund application of tax amount of more than Rs 2 Crore:- All the refund applications where the applicant has cl...
Goods and Services Tax : Important GST Update IFSC of below 8 banks are changed due to merger. Taxpayers may update their Bank Account details through non-...
Goods and Services Tax : Orissa HC held that refund cannot be refused merely because the State might appeal, where no appeal or proceeding was pending on t...
Goods and Services Tax : The Bombay High Court held that the 2019 amendment to Section 54(1) of the GST Act applies prospectively and does not govern refun...
Goods and Services Tax : Delhi High Court ruled that the amendment restricting Explanation 2(e) applies prospectively and cannot take away vested refund ri...
Goods and Services Tax : The Telangana High Court declined to examine the merits of GST refund rejection orders and directed the taxpayer to avail the stat...
Goods and Services Tax : The Tribunal held that procurement strategy, supplier oversight, and sourcing support formed part of a substantive procurement ser...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN resolved a technical issue for QRMP taxpayers on the GST Portal. Refund applications can now be filed, provided GSTR-3B for r...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn about recent GSTN changes for refund filing on service exports with tax, SEZ supplies with tax, and deemed export supplier r...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN announces changes to the refund process for deemed export recipients, removing chronological filing and modifying the refund ...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn how exporters can claim refund of additional IGST paid due to price increases post-export. Details on application process an...
Goods and Services Tax : Circular No. 226/20/2024-GST outlines a procedure for refunding additional IGST paid due to upward price revisions post-export. Le...
Rajasthan High Court in case of M/s B.C. Power Controls Ltd. v. Union of India held that refund application for IGST cannot be indefinitely delayed based on pendency of proceedings. Get full details and analysis here.
Delve into the Karnataka High Court’s ruling on the extended limitation period for ITC refund claims, where the case of Hutti Gold Mines Company Ltd. Vs Union of India was examined.
HC ordered the Revenue department to release assessee’s refund claim with interest. The court held that Revenue cannot withhold refund solely because it plans to appeal to GST tribunal, especially when tribunal is not yet constituted.
The Rajasthan High Court orders a prompt decision on a GST refund application pending for 9 months, setting a limit of 60 days for a resolution in the case Rajcomp Info Services Ltd Vs Union of India.
Delhi High Courts in Sesame Workshop Initiatives (India) Pvt Ltd vs Union of India held that interest should be allowed due to inordinate delay in refunding GST amount to petitioner, setting a precedent for similar cases in future.
In real estate transactions successive payments from buyer of property is involved in form of advances. Considering general view provision of construction services exceeds duration of 3 months therefore can be termed as continuous supply of services* as per Section 2(33) of CGST Act.
Punjab & Haryana HC in Samyak Metals Pvt Ltd Vs UOI mandates a refund along with interest on an amount recovered illegally by GST Department.
Delve into the Delhi High Court ruling that highlights the inviolable right to a GST refund on zero-rated supplies, regardless of any potential appeal by the GST department, in the case of Netgear Technologies India Pvt Ltd vs The Assistant Commissioner GST
HC held that limitation period for GST refund application should be considered from date of online filing, not the date of manual filing
The export of goods and services always receive special attention and treatment in any taxation. It is the endeavor of the Government to ensure that taxes are not exported along with export of goods and services. Under GST, export is treated as zero-rated supply.
