To facilitate foreign investment into the country a number of steps have been taken by Government of India in the past. Setting up an Authority for Advance Rulings (Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax) to give binding rulings, in advance, on Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax matters pertaining to an investment venture in India is one such measure. The legal provisions of Advance Rulings were introduced through the Finance Acts of 1998, 1999 and 2003.
Income Tax : Only specified applicants such as non-residents, certain residents, and public sector companies can apply. The ruling clarifies ta...
Goods and Services Tax : The authority held that oxygen supply through installed infrastructure is a composite supply of goods. The key takeaway is that pr...
Income Tax : Understand when and how to file an advance ruling application under the Income-tax Act, 2025. The update clarifies eligibility, do...
Goods and Services Tax : Recent AAR rulings have raised questions on whether ITC on imports is subject to Section 16(4). While one ruling applies the time ...
Goods and Services Tax : The issue was whether foreign patent filing fees attract GST. The ruling confirms such payments are taxable as import of services ...
Income Tax : From October 2024, applicants can withdraw advance ruling requests pending with the Board for Advance Rulings by October 31. Final...
Income Tax : This handbook aims to provide general guidance on the scheme of Advance Rulings under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act). I...
Income Tax : CBDT launches Boards for Advance Rulings in Delhi & Mumbai, providing tax clarity to investors and entities. Learn more about this...
Goods and Services Tax : New functionality to search for GST Advance Ruling Orders issued by Authority / Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling on GST Por...
Goods and Services Tax : Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) constituted under the provisions of a SGST/ UTGST Act, in terms of the provisions of Section 96...
Goods and Services Tax : The Kerala AAR held that advance ruling applications cannot be based on hypothetical scenarios or academic questions. The Authorit...
Goods and Services Tax : The Kerala AAR held that medicines, consumables, room rent, and ancillary services provided during inpatient treatment form part o...
Goods and Services Tax : Kerala AAR held that used gunny bags sold after cattle feed manufacturing are reusable packing bags under HSN 6305 and not scrap. ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Kerala AAR rejected an advance ruling application after noting that the issue of GST applicability on member transactions had ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Authority ruled that the President and Members of the statutory temple board are not “directors” under GST notifications. ...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the constitution & members of the Advance Ruling Authority under Maharashtra VAT Act 2002. Detailed analysis on its implic...
Goods and Services Tax : Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Authority makes changes in its lineup, appointing Shri. Ajaykumar Vaman Bonde as a member of Ad...
Income Tax : CBDT notifies e-advance rulings (Amendment) Scheme, 2023 which amend e-advance rulings Scheme, 2022. Amendments are related to Boa...
Goods and Services Tax : The Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, has issued Notification No. 02/2023 – Union Territory Tax on May 25, 2023. T...
Income Tax : F No. 189/3/2022-ITA-I Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue (Central Board of Direct Taxes) North Block, ...
Tamil Nadu AAR rules Acer Interactive Flat Panels classifiable under 85285900 as monitors, not ADP machines; GST applicable at 28%.
P.S.K. Traders withdraws its advance ruling application challenging an 18% GST on Palmyra Sugar, leaving the tax rate issue unresolved by the AAR.
The GST AAR for Tamil Nadu disposed of an application from M/s. Chendur Traders regarding the tax rate on palmyra sugar and jaggery after the applicant voluntarily withdrew the request. The company had been issued a tax demand for classifying its products under a lower GST rate.
Tamil Nadu AAR disposes Arun Traders GST case after applicant withdrew ruling request on tax rate dispute over Palmyra sugar classification.
The Customs Authority for Advance Rulings (CAAR) in Mumbai has opted not to issue a ruling on the classification of processed supari, citing a pending case.
Apple India’s request to amend a customs ruling on the classification of its HomePod was denied. The Customs Authority cited a previous court decision on similar devices.
CAAR Delhi classifies Mitsubishi Electric’s Inverter Assembly Units for hybrid vehicles under 8504 40 90 and confirms eligibility for duty exemption under India-Japan CEPA.
Summary of the Tamil Nadu GST AAR ruling for Sundaram Industries on the classification of imported goods and the jurisdiction of the authority.
Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation fails to qualify as a ‘Governmental Authority’ for GST exemption on concessions.
The Karnataka AAR rejected Cheftalk Food And Hospitality Services Pvt. Ltd.’s application for an advance ruling on GST subsidy inclusion, citing pending proceedings.
