Ruling passed by Authority for Advance Rulings Customs , Central Excise & Service Tax. The Authority for Advance Rulings consists of a Chairman who is a retired Judge of the Supreme court and two members of the rank of Additional Secretary to the Government of India, one each from the Indian Revenue Service and the Indian Legal Service.
Goods and Services Tax : Scenario-wise analysis of GST on business canteen services covering ITC, employee recovery, contractor supply, and statutory oblig...
Goods and Services Tax : The ruling examines the composition of lime products and holds that impurities of 10–15% place them under Heading 2522. The Auth...
Goods and Services Tax : Gujarat AAAR rules ITC from one business can offset GST on unrelated output supplies under a single registration, emphasizing fung...
Goods and Services Tax : जीएसटी के तहत एडवांस रूलिंग (AAR) की प्रक्रिया, प्रा...
CA, CS, CMA : Stay informed on India's latest regulatory changes from June 16-22, 2025. This summary covers Income Tax exemptions, GST amendment...
Goods and Services Tax : New functionality to search for GST Advance Ruling Orders issued by Authority / Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling on GST Por...
Goods and Services Tax : Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) constituted under the provisions of a SGST/ UTGST Act, in terms of the provisions of Section 96...
Goods and Services Tax : The Kerala AAR held that advance ruling applications cannot be based on hypothetical scenarios or academic questions. The Authorit...
Goods and Services Tax : The Kerala AAR held that medicines, consumables, room rent, and ancillary services provided during inpatient treatment form part o...
Goods and Services Tax : Kerala AAR held that used gunny bags sold after cattle feed manufacturing are reusable packing bags under HSN 6305 and not scrap. ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Kerala AAR rejected an advance ruling application after noting that the issue of GST applicability on member transactions had ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Authority ruled that the President and Members of the statutory temple board are not “directors” under GST notifications. ...
Goods and Services Tax : Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Authority makes changes in its lineup, appointing Shri. Ajaykumar Vaman Bonde as a member of Ad...
Goods and Services Tax : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan has been appointed as member of Maharashtra Advance Ruling Authority in the place of Mr. Rajiv Magoo. FINANCE DEP...
Goods and Services Tax : Governor of Himachal Pradesh, in supersession of this department’s notification of even No. dated 14.09.2020, published in the e...
Goods and Services Tax : Governor of Delhi under Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, is pleased to reconstitute the Delhi Authority for Advance Ruling...
Goods and Services Tax : Shri. Rajiv Magoo, Joint Commissioner of Central Tax has been appointed as member of Maharashtra GST Advance Ruling Committee in t...
GST AAR Rajasthan clarifies Stadiometer & Infantometer classification as diagnostic medical equipment, placing them in 12% GST slab. Full order details.
In a recent GST ruling by Authority for Advance Ruling in Rajasthan, key questions pertaining to Urban Improvement Trust (UIT) Kota’s classification as a Government Entity, taxability of construction services, and impact of changes in tax rates were addressed.
In a recent ruling by AAR Rajasthan in case of M/S Pink City Steel Rolling Mills Pvt Ltd., issue of GST applicability on delayed payment of interest was addressed.
Explore implications of GST on liquidated damages, trade settlements, and contract breaches in light of South India Krishna Oil & Fact Pvt Ltd case.
Punjab AAR rules that purchases of raw cotton from Kacha Arhtia by Bansal Industries attract GST under reverse charge mechanism as per Section 9(3) of CGST/PGST Act 2017, aligning with Notification No. 13/2017 and No. 43/2017.
M/s International Traders, engaged in import of dry fruits from Pakistan, sought an advance ruling on applicable tax rate for supply of dry dates. However, their application was rejected by Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) in Punjab due to non-compliance with prescribed procedures.
Advance Ruling Authority in Punjab rejected the application submitted by Global Foods due to non-compliance with the prescribed fee requirements.
Advance Ruling Authority in Punjab rejected the application submitted by Paryag Trade Links due to non-compliance with the prescribed format and fee requirements. The applicant, a Works Contractor, sought clarification on the type of GST to be charged in a repair work contract with a company not registered in Punjab.
Advance Ruling Authority in Punjab rejected application submitted by Nidhi Sharma (Zed Enterprises) due to incomplete fee payment. Applicant had only deposited Rs. 5,000 under SGST while filing Advance Ruling Application, falling short of prescribed fee requirement under CGST Act.
GST Advance ruling application rejected as applicant had only deposited Rs. 5,000 under SGST and not under CGST, failing to fulfill prescribed fee requirement under CGST Act.
