This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Benamidar unable to explain source of funds for acquiring alleged property: Appeal dismissed
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Smt. Radhamani A Vs ACIT (Appellate Tribunal Under SAFEMA At Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Appellate Authority
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Smt. Radhamani A Vs ACIT (Appellate Tribunal Under SAFEMA At Delhi)
ITAT Delhi held that the present appeal filed by benamidar is dismissed since the benamidar was unable to explain the source of funds for acquiring the impugned property. However, the issue regarding beneficial owner is kept open for investigation.
Facts- The present appeal u/s 46(1) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 is filed by the appellant Smt. Radhamani A. (alleged benamidar) against the order dated 29.05.2019 passed by the Adjudicating Authority u/s 26(3) of the PBPT Act, in re...
Author Info
