Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : George Stanley Vs DCIT (Kerala High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
George Stanley Vs DCIT (Kerala High Court) No Evidence of Cultivation, No 10(37) – Benefit Mere Trees Don’t Make Land Agricultural – Kerala HC Orders AO to Examine 54F Claim- Rubber Trees Not Enough – Kerala HC Says Agricultural Use Must Be Proved, Directs AO to Reconsider 54F Claim Assessee, a non-resident, sold 94 cents of land with a residential building in Pathanamthitta for ₹6.20 crore, claiming the property was agricultural land & hence not liable to capital gains tax. AO rejected the claim, holding that the property was not agricultural in nature & assessed long-te...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930