Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : U.P. Kar Adhivakta Sangthan (Regd.) Vs State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court)
Appeal Number : PIL NO. 38246 OF 2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/08/2017
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

U.P. Kar Adhivakta Sangthan (Regd.) Vs State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court)

The formats of Form 38 and Form 21 have been adopted and prescribed as a format for E-Way Bill 01 and E-Way Bill 02. This has been done and permitted as an interim measure so that the trading activity and the transit of goods may not be affected till E-Way bill system is developed and approved by the council which is likely to take some time.

In view of above, the prescription of the forms under the impugned notification is only for temporary purpose and the notification itself is for an interim period till E-Way bill system is developed and approved by the council.

The notification as stated earlier is not in violation of any statutory provision or Rule 138 of the Rules. The challenge to the notification and the circulars therefore has no merit.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031