Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjay Industrial Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai [2015 (57) Taxman 319 – SC]
Appeal Number :
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :

Last 2 days to register for Online GST Certification course?

 CA Bimal Jain

In the instant case, Sanjay Industrial Corporation (the Appellant) was engaged in profile cutting viz. cutting larger size plates into small size and shapes using gas cutting machines, as per requirements of customers.

The Department invoked extended period of limitation alleging that the process carried out by Appellant amount to manufacture and thus exigible to Excise duty.

The Appellant argued that in case of another assessee, Adjudication Order had found that there was doubt earlier whether process amounted to manufacture and had deleted penalty. Hence, owing to bona fide belief, there was no suppression of facts leading to invocation of extended period of limitation.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that when even as per the Department, there was certain doubt relating to excisability of process carried out by Appellant, the conduct of the Appellant was bonafide and hence extended period of limitation cannot be invoked.Further,Penalties were also set aside.

(Bimal Jain, FCA, FCS, LLB, B.Com (Hons),  Email: bimaljain@hotmail.com)

Click Read Other Articles from CA Bimal Jain

More Under Excise Duty

Posted Under

Category : Excise Duty (4051)
Type : Articles (14801)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *