ACIT Vs Chironji Lal Shivhare (ITAT Agra) During the course of hearing on 23/2/2021 it was informed by the Ld.AR for the assessee that the assessee has expired in the month of November 2020, therefore he will not be able to argue the matter and sought time to bring on record the Legal Heirs, death […]
Krishna Kumar Sharma Vs DCIT (ITAT Agra) It is clear that the land in question was acquired by National Highway Authority of India on 05.02.2013 under the National Highway Authority Act, 1856. When the award was passed acquiring the land, the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 […]
Dinesh Chandra Dutta Bhargava Vs DCIT (ITAT Agra) The only question to be adjudicated in the instant case is whether the assessee is entitled for deduction u/s. 54/54F of the Act in the attending circumstances of the case or not and whether the changed legal position of section 54, as noted by ld. CIT(A), is […]
Jhansi Development Authority Commissionery Compus Vs DCIT (ITAT Agra) As the assessee had derived all its income only on account of charitable activities undertaken by it pursuant to its object and for the welfare the general public, which were not in the nature of trade , commerce or business. The income even if any earned […]
The issue under consideration is whether the interest income on FDR’s pledged for security purposes in obtaining the contract business comes within the ambit of business income?
The issue under consideration is whether the addition made u/s 69 by AO due to undisclosed sources of cash deposits in bank account is justified in law?
The issue under consideration is whether reopen assessment u/s 147 based on the same material which is examined by AO in original assessment is justified in law?
he auditors in their tax audit report have also not mentioned of any violation of provisions of section 40A(3), as these payments have been made on account of business expediency where insistence of cash by the agents and truck drivers has been established by the appellant.
AO was not justified in denying the exemption under section 11 on the ground of excessive payment of salary and professional fees to Doctors as the services rendered by doctors who had passed out with the same degree in Cardiology (DM) could not be compared with experience doctor working in the field for the last ten years.
Rajesh Ladhani Vs DCIT (ITAT Agra) It is evident from the CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2008, dated 12.3.2008 that the legislature in its highest wisdom made it compulsory that the assessments of search cases should be made with the prior approval of superior authority, so that the superior authority apply their mind on the […]
