The issue under consideration is Whether compensation paid to earlier buyer to cancel the agreement is deductible expenditure u/s 48 for calculation of Capital Gains?
Gateway Leasing Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) The issue under consideration is whether the re-opening of the assessment u/s 147 is justified in law? In the present case, after referring to the information received following search and seizure action carried out in the premises of Shri Naresh Jain, it was stated that information […]
The issue under consideration is whether the services in relation to issuance of GDRs are covered under the provisions of Section 9(i)(vii) and whether the same liable for TDS under the provisions of Section 195 of the Act?
The issue under consideration is whether the addition made by AO u/s 14A with respect of Interest free funds is justified in law?
The issue under consideration is whether the charge of interest under sections 234B and 234C on the book profit was not justified?
The issue under consideration is whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that provisions of section 69C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are not applicable for assessee?
No mandatory directions, much less directions, can be issued to the State Legislature to include the legal services rendered by the advocates into essential services. The directions as sought by the Petitioner cannot be issued to the State Legislature to legislate in a particular manner,
High Court states that, however, insofar as the net refundable amount of Rs. 833,04,88,000/- is concerned, in our view, the respondents already having invoked their powers under Section 245 of the Act which action has ended with passing of the order dated 28th May, 2020, the respondents cannot withheld the admitted refundable amount of Rs. 833,04,88,000/- on the ground that the respondents may have a future demand against the petitioner arising out of the pending assessment orders.
PCIT Vs B.T. Patil & Sons Belgaum Construction P Ltd (Bombay High Court) The issue under consideration is whether the Tribunal is correct in disallowing the deduction of interest expenditure on the ground that the assessee had diverted interest bearing funds for non-business purposes? In the present case, The assessee had outstanding balance shown in the […]
The issue under consideration is whether the loan given by the Government which was subsequently waived off can be taxed under Section 28(iv) of Income Tax Act?
