If amount already been considered in subsequent assessment years and assessment order has been passed, the question of escapement of income for same amount in previous year will not arise.
Bombay High Court admits Playerzpot’s petition challenging GST demand, issues notice. Detailed analysis of Rule 31A and CGST Act. Get insights into the legal battle.
Bombay HC directs CESTAT examination in Sarla Perf. Fibers vs. Union of India. Legal analysis of anti-dumping duty notifications. Petitioner challenges legality.
Bombay High Court held that it was appropriate for the petitioner to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution for refund of money as amount deposited under protest was retained by the department without authority of law.
Bombay High Court quashes assessment order, directs JAO to provide specific information for Section 148A(b) notice. Detailed analysis and implications of the judgment.
Bombay High Court’s landmark judgment nullifies Income Tax assessments for AY 2016-2017, citing improper sanction under Section 151(i) instead of Section 151(ii) of the Income Tax Act 1961. Read the full text and implications.
Bombay High Court held that AO is not entitled to commence proceedings for reassessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act based on change of opinion as material facts are fully and truly disclosed.
Learn about Bombay High Court’s Quashing of Reassessment notice by the Tax Department against a non-existent entity with an active PAN in this AY 2016-17 and AY 2017-18 case study.
Bombay High Court’s directive to Maharashtra on the development of Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal’s website. Progress update and next hearing on 28th November 2023.”
Explore the recent landmark judgment by Rajasthan HC on ITC refund denial in the case of Nahar Industrial Enterprises. Analysis of the decision and its implications.
