ITAT Delhi rules in favor of Arvind Kumar Agarwal, allowing Section 10AA deduction despite late return filing. Tribunal highlights absence of mandatory filing clause.
ITAT Ahmedabad rules on Aprameya Engineering’s appeal against tax rate denial under Section 115BAA due to delayed Form 10-IC filing. Judicial precedents examined.
ITAT Raipur held that dismissal of appeal by CIT(A) without disposing off on merits, merely on account of non-prosecution is unjustifiable. Accordingly, order set-aside with direction to dispose off on merits.
ITAT Delhi deleted additions made on alleged bogus purchases by Rama Hygienic Products Pvt. Ltd., citing lack of evidence and reliance on oral statements.
ITAT Lucknow held that addition by calculating sales on hypothetical basis and completely ignoring various evidences submitted during course of assessment proceedings is unjustifiable. Accordingly, appeal allowed and addition is deleted.
ITAT Chennai held that addition under section 69A of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained money not legally sustainable since nature and source of cash deposits duly explained. Accordingly, addition is liable to be deleted.
ITAT Mumbai rules on Nickunj Eximp case: Disputes over bogus purchases, demonetization cash deposits, and assessment procedures.
ITAT Mumbai condones a 314-day delay in Atlantic Bio Medical Pvt. Ltd.’s appeal, citing a bona fide mistake in tax filing and a right to a fair hearing.
ITAT Bangalore held that that mens rea is not an essential condition for imposing penalties under civil acts. Penalty u/s. 270A of the Income Tax Act nowhere specifically refers necessity of presence of mens rea for levy of penalty. Accordingly, appeal of revenue allowed.
ITAT Delhi quashes penalty on Babu Ram u/s 271(1)(c) as barred by limitation. Penalty order dated April 1, 2022, violated extended timelines due to COVID-19.
