The Court held that supplies made before 18 July 2022 were eligible for the 12% concessional GST rate, as withdrawal of benefit applied prospectively. Taxpayers can file rectification applications under Section 161 to correct such errors.
The Delhi High Court held that a deficiency memo under Rule 90 of the CGST Rules must be issued within 15 days of filing a refund application. Delay beyond this period entitles taxpayers to interest on the refund.
The Madras High Court stayed recovery for 90 days, allowing Faiz Wahab time to file a stay application after the sale advance refund was taxed as unexplained income.
Delhi High Court held that non-granting of exemption claimed under section 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act due to delay of 16 days in filing audited report in From 10B not justified since the due to inadvertence error on the part of the auditor / tax professional.
In a case concerning Uzbekistan Airways, the Delhi High Court granted time to file an appeal against a GST demand of ₹35.39 lakh. The Court held that the appeal, once filed within time, must be heard on merits.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail to an accused in a ₹19 crore fake ITC case after six months of custody, holding further detention unwarranted.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed a plea challenging Sections 69 and 132 of the HGST Act, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Radhika Agarwal upholding the validity of GST arrest provisions.
The Calcutta High Court permitted Subrata Mondal to clear his tax liability in installments after an initial ₹10 lakh payment, directing the appeal to be heard on merits.
The Delhi High Court found that further notices issued under Section 142(1) after the expiry of the statutory time limit were unlawful and ordered closure of reassessment proceedings.
The Bombay High Court stayed orders treating PCMC as an assessee in default for not deducting TDS on issuance of TDRs, holding that Section 194LA applies only to monetary compensation.
